Re: 9.4 release notes

From: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.4 release notes
Date: 2014-05-06 13:53:54
Message-ID: CAP-rdTa-S6BAnb6zMmqc1kFfZhnMEuM_LKTAaPJ+-8GTR=77rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2014-05-05 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:

> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:40:29AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> * ALTER SYSTEM SET
>>
>> Lemme know if you need description text for any of the above.
>
> OK, great! Once I have the markup done, I will beef up the descriptions
> if needed and copy the text up to the major items section so we have
> that all ready for beta.

“Add SQL-level command ALTER SYSTEM command [..]”

Using “command” twice sounds weird to my ears. Wouldn’t leaving out
the second instance be better?

Nicolas

--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-05-06 14:01:20 Re: [PATCH] `pg_dump -Fd` doesn't check write return status...
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-05-06 13:49:07 Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses