Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Date: 2014-10-16 15:28:28
Message-ID: CAOuzzgokbcMeT01jyjODeF1=--k98Fp_X5nA0geyvy64Hd=C8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert,

On Thursday, October 16, 2014, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > As a side-note, this change is included in the 'role attributes' patch.
>
> It's really important that we keep separate changes in separate
> patches that are committed in separate commits. Otherwise, it gets
> really confusing.
>

I can do that, but it overlaps with the MONITORING role attribute changes
also..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Johnson 2014-10-16 15:33:03 Re: WIP: dynahash replacement for buffer table
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-10-16 15:24:21 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review