Re: [v9.4] row level security

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Karol Trzcionka <karlikt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.4] row level security
Date: 2013-07-23 04:23:26
Message-ID: CAOeZVifqpb+HiT7gQZYcCNuCn-3LFEJOvHns9BurqsP5uiJGGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> (This is a bit much to expect new reviewers to chew on usefully) I've been
> working on that here, but I don't have anything I can publicly commit to
> yet.
>

True that.

I spent some time on it, but couldn't come up with anything useful.
Mike's extensive testing seems good enough for me, though.

One thing I was a bit concerned about (I don't know if it has been
resolved already, or if it isn't a concern) is that there was an issue
about a security part being visible in the syntax (or something like
that, my memory isn't too good today morning).

Regards,

Atri

Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-07-23 04:52:19 Re: Auto explain target tables
Previous Message David Fetter 2013-07-23 04:22:06 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax