| From: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |
| Date: | 2014-03-04 09:51:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAOeZVifj=icp8+0TGovWqr3WK7RNqPN5QsRtTrAfo2_1YuAQKw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > If its not the case, the user should be more careful about when he is
> > scheduling backups to so that they dont conflict with DDL changes.
>
> That is most certainly the wise choice.
>
> > I am not too comfortable with exposing the locking type to the user. That
> > may be just me though.
>
> Why would that be a problem? Hard reasons, please.
>
Should we genuinely depend on the user's good judgement to decide the
locking types?
--
Regards,
Atri
*l'apprenant*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-03-04 09:57:56 | Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices. |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-03-04 09:43:49 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |