Re: Proper query implementation for Postgresql driver

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proper query implementation for Postgresql driver
Date: 2014-09-30 05:40:42
Message-ID: CAOeZVietZvW3JnUaPGC+OmWtqCLFg80dZnjVvZp39No2yPNHSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> writes:
> > Thanks for the suggestion to look at PgJDBC, I'll do that.
>
> BTW, libpqtypes (http://libpqtypes.esilo.com) might be worth
> studying as well. I've not used it myself, but it claims to
> offer datatype-extensible processing of binary formats.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
>
>
It does offer that, and is indeed a good idea in the current context.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-09-30 05:44:10 Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-09-30 05:36:17 Re: Proper query implementation for Postgresql driver