Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rodrigo E(dot) De León Plicet <rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Date: 2011-12-08 04:08:55
Message-ID: CAOR=d=3uEsF2Fa=vzc2h-maV+80q7AybC0T+NmqOQDD5sa5W7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
<rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> http://www.dbms2.com/2011/11/23/hope-for-a-new-postgresql-era/
>
> Some of the points mentioned:
> - MySQL is narrowing the gap, but PostgreSQL is still ahead of MySQL
>  in some ways.  (Database extensibility if nothing else.)
> - Neither EnterpriseDB (which now calls itself “The enterprise
> PostgreSQL
>  company”) nor the PostgreSQL community leadership have covered
> themselves
>  with stewardship glory.
> - PostgreSQL advancement is not dead.

I'd like to see the author's thoughts filled out on these points.
they seem rather vague and overly simplistic, and I wonder what
specific points he might have to make rather than this vague "hand
wavy" list he has so far.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2011-12-08 05:26:13 Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2011-12-08 03:55:48 pg crash shortly after 9.1.1 -> 9.1.2 upgrade