On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I don't know if/when that will happen as such, but Simon was making noises
> about writing code to treat hash indexes as unlogged automatically, which
> would more or less fix the worst risks. That's not just a special case
> for hash indexes, but any index AM that lacks WAL support, as third-party
> AMs might well do.
>
As someone writing a 3rd-party AM, literally right this moment, do you have
a link to that thread? While I follow this list fairly closely I don't
remember seeing this. I'd love to understand the thoughts around handling
extension-based AMs.
eric