| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user |
| Date: | 2016-08-03 13:43:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YF1CSZ7cesOVWCzK5iXoiCqVkOY0mid0=PycQmRP8ZBYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 August 2016 at 05:14, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> In short, I think Uber's position that logical replication is somehow more
> reliable than physical is just wishful thinking. If anything, my money
> would be on the other way around: there's a lot less mechanism that can go
> wrong in physical replication.
Particularly since they aren't using row-based logical replication, but -
it seems - statement based replication. We all know the problems there.
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-08-03 13:47:39 | Re: Way to access LSN (for each transaction) by directly talking to postgres? |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-08-03 13:39:22 | Detecting skipped data from logical slots (data silently skipped) |