Re: recovery testing for beta

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery testing for beta
Date: 2014-05-30 22:21:24
Message-ID: CAMkU=1yEc1SMHg9COLP7zJh9wWprjbznbodCee9Ew8nQmxAbTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
>
> Another feature which have interaction with recovery is reduced WAL
> for Update operation:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1WNqjM-0003cz-EL@gemulon.postgresql.org
>
> Commit: a3115f
>

It looks like this is something which is "always on", so it should be
getting a good test without me taking any special steps. But is there some
way, for example something in xlogdump, to assess how often this is getting
activated?

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2014-05-30 23:44:09 Re: [HACKERS] unable to build postgres-9.4 in os x 10.9 with python
Previous Message Josh Kupershmidt 2014-05-30 21:33:26 Re: Proposing pg_hibernate