From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: make check-world output |
Date: | 2017-03-11 00:15:15 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1x3_5m5ccDmPQFoG9UFHTKjcEi9RX4L=gFZFBd+HZDzLw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> > Also, it runs in about 8 minutes, not the 20 minutes reported by others.
> > My system is virtualized, and not particularly fast. I wonder if it is
> > failing early somewhere without running to completion? How would/should I
> > know?
>
> Maybe you don't have --enable-tap-tests?
>
Yes, adding that does solve the too-fast "problem". But it doesn't solve
the "I don't know what this output to stderr means" problem.
Should --enable-tap-tests be mentioned in "32.1.3. Additional Test Suites"?
Or at least cross-referenced from "32.4. TAP Tests"?
It was obvious to me that check-world wouldn't test plperl unless plperl
was configured. But not so obvious that it wouldn't test anything using
the tap framework unless that was configured, until after you pointed it
out.
Thanks,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-11 00:15:59 | Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-11 00:13:25 | Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4 |