Re: Freezing without write I/O

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Freezing without write I/O
Date: 2014-05-15 00:46:49
Message-ID: CAMkU=1wDb5v=9ZjY-MHnbAH9ptMqW10oqZqXFmbLF7haEWbPOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday, January 27, 2014, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > On 26 January 2014 12:58, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >> On 2014-01-25 20:26:16 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >>> Shouldn't this patch be in the January commitfest?
> >>
> >> I think we previously concluded that there wasn't much chance to get
> >> this into 9.4 and there's significant work to be done on the patch
> >> before new reviews are required, so not submitting it imo makes sense.
> >
> > I think we should make this a priority feature for 9.5
>
> +1. I can't think of many things we might do that would be more important.
>
>
Can anyone guess how likely this approach is to make it into 9.5? I've
been pondering some incremental improvements over what we have now, but if
this revolutionary approach has a high chance of landing then any work on
incremental improvements would be pointless.

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2014-05-15 04:25:17 Re: Freezing without write I/O
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-05-15 00:42:26 Re: [PATCH] Writing changes of decoding plugin in the memory context where data is kept?