Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml
Date: 2015-01-08 04:23:31
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTy44dktQXY8AbgDavD8DgpRO=oN843QeWOf9cEKoxX8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Where the USING parameter is 'expression' but the WITH CHECK parameter
> is 'check_expression'. He makes a good point, I believe, as
> "expression" is overly generic. I don't like the idea of using
> "barrier_expression" though as that ends up introducing a new term- how
> about "using_expression"?

Yes, I think "using_expression" works best.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-01-08 05:03:35 Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-08 01:55:18 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS