Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Date: 2013-06-06 06:31:51
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTwNSHbS-OaL0g37zwCp1PEGQZ8XSS3iKeJ=wck2Z8XeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I have zero doubt that in your case it is true and desirable. I just don't
> know that it is a positive solution to the problem as a whole. Your case is
> rather limited to your environment, which is rather limited to the type of
> user that your environment has. Which lends itself to the idea that this
> should be a Heroku Postgres thing, not a .Org wide thing.

If you look through the -general archives, or on stack overflow you'll
find ample evidence that it is a problem that lots of people have.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-06-06 07:01:21 Re: Move unused buffers to freelist
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-06-06 06:28:49 Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments