Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date: 2014-09-29 17:40:03
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTw+6oUagGCpYvy1UbHKQ88_-tiLVMzeh21DFEhYmXyDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> But more likely, somebody will
>> go find some other bit space that can be used to do this.

My concerns have nothing to do with the availability of bit space, obviously.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-29 17:41:38 effective_io_concurrency documentation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-29 17:38:37 Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)