From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)freebsd(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Date: | 2014-04-22 00:36:19 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTcoUFrFZ5j4+xXbGGFQ4x6pJe+ApmmTa_-g0ONZbsT0g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> If there are indeed such large regressions on FreeBSD we need to treat
> them as postgres regressions. It's nicer not to add config options for
> things that don't need it, but apparently that's not the case here.
+1, but I think this is something for packagers to get right, not users.
I really don't like the idea of playing chicken with the FreeBSD
people, especially since we're going to use System V shared memory
into the foreseeable future anyway. It's probably *far* easier for us
to fix it than it is for the FreeBSD people to fix it.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-22 00:42:14 | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2014-04-22 00:34:58 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |