Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
Date: 2014-04-16 18:07:02
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTFQ4vF+=mtKsJawo1hw7MkwE5VoOVrqrkQ2FZ1Mhx2cw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think he's being unreasonable, and I don't understand why
> you're getting bent out of shape about it. You proposed a patch, he
> articulated a problem, you don't want to fix it right now. All of
> which is fine. Why the ad hominem accusations?

I just think it's bad form to hold something like this to the same
standards as a formal commitfest submission. I am well aware that the
patch probably has several scalability issues.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-04-16 18:10:52 Re: The case against multixact GUCs
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-04-16 18:06:19 Re: Need Multixact Freezing Docs