Re: DDL Damage Assessment

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL Damage Assessment
Date: 2014-10-02 20:38:33
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSiMNU5RPnDqHpd7D_ef72jbPt=Ozw8rsVBV2iocO1iTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> And yet, in theory session 2's impact
> on production should not be minimal, if we consider something like
> EXPLAIN output.

"Should have been minimal", I mean.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2014-10-02 20:52:29 Re: DDL Damage Assessment
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-02 20:37:40 Re: DDL Damage Assessment