| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Alton <thomas(dot)alton(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| Date: | 2016-05-23 19:28:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSWjLPn+_T1A_WKZnRe_pcG+KQ7fk8ZFZ1jyJZk0SrjhA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It seems unlikely to me that recursing into the name lists is helpful
> here: those are not going to contain any data that is interpretable
> without context. Did you have a reason to do that?
I saw no reason to avoid the extra cycles. A noticeable omission has a
cost: it gets noticed. Given this code path is likely to hardly ever
be hit, this mechanical approach seemed best. That's all.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 19:48:38 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 19:22:07 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2016-05-23 19:39:54 | Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 19:22:07 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |