Re: Minmax indexes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes
Date: 2014-08-08 00:56:40
Message-ID: CAM3SWZS18r9x6qmq+YKGdQ9xavB-naQAasRCx08rRsMi2AQbqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> range index might get confused with range types; block range index
> seems better. I like summary, but I'm fine with block range index or
> block filter index, too.

+1

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-08-08 01:02:54 Re: Reporting the commit LSN at commit time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-08-08 00:53:36 Re: Fixed redundant i18n strings in json