Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Matt Kelly <mkelly(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matt Spilich <mspilich(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Date: 2014-09-18 05:36:34
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRq06F4qysAyvwPchFuSRBwW6rf=UjLoz0AjNO_WR-csg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> In my understanding PostgreSQL's manual MUST include the ICU license
> term (this is not a problem). What I am not so sure is, any software
> uses PostgreSQL also MUST include the ICU license or not. If yes, I
> think this is surely a problem.

It uses the MIT license, which is less restrictive than even the BSD
license. I believe one part (the Chinese/Japanese Word Break
Dictionary Data) is BSD Licensed, though:

https://ssl.icu-project.org/repos/icu/icu/trunk/license.html

I don't think licensing would be a problem.
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2014-09-18 06:32:54 Assertion failure in syncrep.c
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2014-09-18 04:35:10 Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps