Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2014-02-04 21:50:10
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRcT3xATLbSDY-w=fC1y7fLfJQe20dVUm5R+sZ8oJhShA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Does this feature relate to compression of WAL page images at all?
>
> No.

So the obvious question is: where, if anywhere, do the two efforts
(this patch, and Fujii's patch) overlap? Does Fujii have any concerns
about this patch as it relates to his effort to compress FPIs?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-02-04 21:58:08 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-04 21:47:00 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation