Re: WAL replay bugs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL replay bugs
Date: 2014-04-18 06:19:38
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRDywG2d92bN5fLT=oz_Jo10RbXhEfkuVEKcp=tnyAiCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Any objections to changing those two?
>
> Not here. I've always suspected #2 was going to bite us someday anyway.

+1

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2014-04-18 07:08:25 Re: Patch: iff -> if
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-04-18 03:21:05 Re: assertion failure 9.3.4