Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax
Date: 2014-10-02 19:46:19
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQzW0r9-aPC-o5v=rfO5M+NMnxwutJy3swJayO6CmwYtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I've started off by adding varied examples of the use of the existing
> proposed syntax. I'll expand on this soon.

I spent some time today expanding on the details, and commenting on
the issues around the custom syntax (exactly what it does, issues
around ambiguous conflict-on unique indexes, etc).

Also, "Challenges, issues" has been updated - I've added some
"secondary concerns". These are non-contentious items that I think are
of concern, and would like to highlight now.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message José Luis Tallón 2014-10-02 19:48:31 Re: DDL Damage Assessment
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-10-02 19:43:43 Re: DDL Damage Assessment