Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices
Date: 2014-11-01 20:38:43
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQnC=eQm8Yc3JgofhfLTu4tgv1A7BowsP_mHVQq8NAFBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not all that excited about unlogged hash indexes. Yes, that'll
> remove a annoying hazard, but I probably won't use them anyway. I am
> somewhat excited about the more general unlogged indexes feature.

I strongly agree.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-11-01 20:59:34 Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-11-01 19:51:39 Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices