Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2?
Date: 2014-02-19 02:03:07
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQChxjUEbmHx0BrrbM0bE4c3u5334bLAs8iJ+sL0pT52g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> That was my first suspicion, but then re-indexing didn't help, while
> VACUUM FREEZE had the immediate effect of making both plans give a
> consistent answer.

I should add that this is an unremarkable int4 primary key (which was
dropped and recreated by the customer). There is no obvious reason why
we should see wrong answers that are attributable to application code
or environment.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-02-19 02:10:02 Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-02-19 01:56:48 Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2?