Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Date: 2014-02-19 16:03:38
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNMJuNqshohPg1zQfJaUtWRpXeZOWgMj+4LRxf08p+gCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hopefully the commit I just pushed will fix it. It now works on my
> machine with and without --disable-float8-byval.

It builds and passes here on 32bits

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-02-19 16:04:19 Re: WAL Rate Limiting
Previous Message David Fetter 2014-02-19 16:01:20 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled.