Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData
Date: 2019-01-27 07:03:17
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNFfvGYBUA5R9Nqrvrbc1_2m01t-YYBFX3urTx7Srm73A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I assume you already considered and rejected having a fixed size null
bitmap followed by a variable size array of datums. That seems like it
would be denser and work better with cpu cache.

I guess the reason you prefer the struct is because it can be used
elsewhere on its own?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-27 07:13:15 Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-01-27 04:20:59 Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData