Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Date: 2013-12-11 00:28:33
Message-ID: CAM-w4HMq2J91wVb-sGT0H3E+Tn90nFq4byz9TcSnUGrxpTmTPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Block sampling, with parameter to specify sample size. +1

Simon this is very frustrating. Can you define "block sampling"?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-12-11 00:34:44 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-12-11 00:23:59 Re: pg_stat_statements fingerprinting logic and ArrayExpr