Re: sortsupport for text

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sortsupport for text
Date: 2012-03-20 01:20:16
Message-ID: CAM-w4HMg-f9Suk+Fou7gY9aF8s2saw43GNbCcdbB2+PYSE8c6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
<kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> Ouch. I was holding out hope that you could get a meaningful
> improvement if we could use the first X bytes of the strxfrm output so
> you only need to do a strcoll on strings that actually nearly match.
> But with an information density of 9 bytes for one 1 character it
> doesn't seem worthwhile.

When I was playing with glibc it was 4n. I think what they do is have
n bytes for the high order bits, then n bytes for low order bits like
capitalization or whitespace differences. I suspect they used to use
16 bits for each and have gone to some larger size.

> That and this gem in the strxfrm manpage:
>
> RETURN VALUE
>       The  strxfrm()  function returns the number of bytes required to
>       store the transformed string in dest excluding the terminating
>       '\0' character.  If the value returned is n or more, the
>       contents of dest are indeterminate.
>
> Which means that you have to take the entire transformed string, you
> can't just ask for the first bit. I think that kind of leaves the whole
> idea dead in the water.

I believe the intended API is that you allocate a buffer with your
guess of the right size, call strxfrm and if it returns a larger
number you realloc your buffer and call it again.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-03-20 01:36:54 Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2012-03-20 01:19:23 Re: Incorrect assumptions with low LIMITs