Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)
Date: 2013-04-08 14:41:39
Message-ID: CAM-w4HM9EqAtcJ5AMYpPbGP+4LY=TjcSEn13X1GGReA87kZicQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The only reasonable answer for this (a provably used, non-security,
> non-standards violating, non-gross functionality breakage case) is
> *zero*. Our historically cavalier attitude towards compatibility
> breakage has been an immense disservice to our users and encourages
> very bad upgrade habits and is, IMNSHO, embarrassing.
>

The flip side of this is that the ability to make improvements freely is
one of the biggest strengths of free software over commercial software.
Oracle and Microsoft invest *tons* of money in maintaining huge libraries
of backward compatibility code and drastically limits their ability to keep
making improvements.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-04-08 14:42:30 Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-04-08 14:36:26 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Get rid of USE_WIDE_UPPER_LOWER dependency in trigram constructi