| From: | Metin Doslu <metin(at)citusdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| Date: | 2013-12-04 18:06:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAL1dPcerzbGnrkRWeAmUNAL6K63b-cTxoGirzLi12SPxk0GYEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> Didn't follow the thread from the start. So, this is EC2? Have you
> checked, with a recent enough version of top or whatever, how much time
> is reported as "stolen"?
Yes, this EC2. "stolen" is randomly reported as 1, mostly as 0.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Metin Doslu | 2013-12-04 18:19:55 | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-04 18:04:11 | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Metin Doslu | 2013-12-04 18:19:55 | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-04 18:04:11 | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |