Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers

From: Metin Doslu <metin(at)citusdata(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers
Date: 2013-12-05 15:57:44
Message-ID: CAL1dPcc4eLygnLZs-TFPrZ7YxwucLJ1-Muwn64+JmNnjW6VWfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

> You tested the correct branch, right? Which commit does "git rev-parse
> HEAD" show?

I applied last two patches manually on PostgreSQL 9.2 Stable.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-05 15:59:49 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-05 15:52:50 Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2013-12-05 15:57:49 Re: One huge db vs many small dbs
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-12-05 15:52:46 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers