Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage

From: "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Date: 2014-10-16 19:39:15
Message-ID: CAKRt6CTdBsrY1w7aoCKEChUyrWxdT+tuv-OJk6wCYNY-PEN5Bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I'll break them into three pieces- superuser() cleanup, GetUserId() ->
> has_privs_of_role(), and the additional-role-attributes patch will just
> depend on the others.
>

The superuser() cleanup has already been submitted to the current
commitfest.

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1587

-Adam

--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-10-16 19:45:08 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-16 19:37:09 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review