Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation

From: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Date: 2014-11-26 00:55:46
Message-ID: CAKRt6CRFYphqebqs1jsyaxZTk=y3oUfE+u-6LDm74hcJw+-MWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen,

Having an array sounds pretty reasonable to me.
>

Ok, sounds good, I think so too.

Users interested in having a string instead could use array_to_string().
> Having to go the other way isn't as nice, imo.
>

My thoughts exactly, but wanted to at least put it out there.

Thanks,
Adam

--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2014-11-26 01:20:35 Re: On partitioning
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-11-26 00:18:23 Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation