Re: fixing pg_ctl with relative paths

From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fixing pg_ctl with relative paths
Date: 2013-06-27 01:36:00
Message-ID: CAK3UJRE-ZB6H-CCuXUURpe+-P09tJfjXzcNNA7s5jXzK2eU04g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
>> On June 26, 2013 5:02 AM Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>>>Thanks for the feedback. Attached is a rebased version of the patch with
>> the two small issues noted fixed.
>
> The following description in the document of pg_ctl needs to be modified?
>
> restart might fail if relative paths specified were specified on
> the command-line during server start.

Right, that caveat could go away.

> +#define DATADIR_SPEC "\"-D\" \""
> +
> + datadir = strstr(post_opts, DATADIR_SPEC);
>
> Though this is a corner case, the patch doesn't seem to handle properly the case
> where "-D" appears as other option value, e.g., -k option value, in
> postmaster.opts
> file.

Could I see a command-line example of what you mean?

> Just idea to work around that problem is to just append the specified -D option
> and value to post_opts. IOW, -D option and value appear twice in post_opts.
> In this case, posteriorly-located ones are used in the end. Thought?

Hrm, I think we'd have to be careful that postmaster.opts doesn't
accumulate an additional -D specification with every restart.

Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KONDO Mitsumasa 2013-06-27 02:17:21 Re: [PATCH] add --progress option to pgbench (submission 3)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-06-27 01:34:37 Re: [PATCH] Revive line type