Re: Improving avg performance for numeric

From: Hadi Moshayedi <hadi(at)moshayedi(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
Date: 2013-08-29 05:09:15
Message-ID: CAK=1=Wqo+6GwEhiiTjkJyrTrRvdj9nEBS+ygWW=i0-a7hmN=uQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

> int, float, double 26829 ms (26675 ms) -- 0.5% slower .. statistic error ..
> cleaner code
> numeric sum 6490 ms (7224 ms) -- 10% faster
> numeric avg 6487 ms (12023 ms) -- 46% faster

I also got very similar results.

On the other hand, initially I was receiving sigsegv's whenever I
wanted to try to run an aggregate function. gdb was telling that this
was happening somewhere in nodeAgg.c at ExecInitAgg. While trying to
find the reason, I had to reboot my computer at some point, after the
reboot the sigsegv's went away. I want to look into this and find the
reason, I think I have missed something here. Any thoughts about why
this would happen?

--Hadi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-08-29 05:48:45 Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
Previous Message Noah Misch 2013-08-29 02:30:34 Re: Valgrind Memcheck support