Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Asif Naeem <anaeem(dot)it(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Date: 2014-09-01 15:57:02
Message-ID: CAJrrPGfqDejUcYSWWwkVt520eBFj5Nj0WX4woUf=8JObHsXLBQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Thanks for your review. Please find the rebased patch to latest HEAD.
>
> Committed with minor (mostly cosmetic) alterations.

Thanks.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-09-01 17:01:54 Re: BUG #11321: describe command is getting locked due to ALTER statement running on public table
Previous Message thomas 2014-09-01 15:41:49 BUG #11325: Documentation Bug / RFE

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-09-01 15:59:37 Re: On partitioning
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-09-01 15:52:25 Re: On partitioning