Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?

From: Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
Date: 2014-06-24 19:54:47
Message-ID: CAJghg4LysZuBiZCd-PSixkpEFGVL9JmB68vO73ybcKqPHUs8ZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> A way to put UNLOGGED objects in such a space and have them recovered
> if they vanish would also be valuable, IMO.
>
> Not necessarily in the same patch, I'd just rather keep it in mind so
> any chosen design doesn't preclude adding that later.
>

The idea is nice, but I think you should think more about it. Were would we
put the "init" files in this case? It surely can't be in the tablespace.

Best regards,
--
Matheus de Oliveira
Analista de Banco de Dados
Dextra Sistemas - MPS.Br nível F!
www.dextra.com.br/postgres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Piotr Stefaniak 2014-06-24 20:01:26 Keepalive-related socket options under FreeBSD 9, 10
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-06-24 19:44:01 Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD