Re: Re: Hot standby 9.2.6 -> 9.2.6 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages

From: Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jlrando <jose(dot)luis(dot)rando(dot)calvo(at)ericsson(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Hot standby 9.2.6 -> 9.2.6 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages
Date: 2014-06-09 18:58:17
Message-ID: CAJghg4+p2aJaZEg3-awKd0Yd15HR5VMrzpKdJoV3yyVS_Mn1wA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:10 AM, jlrando <jose(dot)luis(dot)rando(dot)calvo(at)ericsson(dot)com
> wrote:

> Perform an upgrade of this DB will require a
> lot of time because the only certified DB version for this application is
> 9.2.6.
>

This simple makes no sense for PG release versioning schema/policy, see [1].

Following schema X.Y.Z of a PG release, you may "certifies" an application
to work on version X.Y only, the Z number means the release (bug-fix/patch
basically), and you should **always** be using the most higher Z for your
X.Y version (in the case of 9.2, you should be using 9.2.8 already, no
excuses). In summary, you can always upgrade from Z to Z+1 without
compatibility issues. Of course, read the release notes to check if there
is some maintenance needed after the upgrade.

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

--
Matheus de Oliveira
Analista de Banco de Dados
Dextra Sistemas - MPS.Br nível F!
www.dextra.com.br/postgres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message geoff 2014-06-09 19:16:09 BUG #10587: ERROR: variable not found in subplan target list
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-06-09 15:57:35 Re: Many processes blocked at ProcArrayLock!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-06-09 19:04:04 Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-06-09 18:55:54 Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates