| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch |
| Date: | 2012-03-28 16:13:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAJKUy5ijJE_xbZq91YzZSgN73uULQ9ppjPvog4-7ca+6ck0Rjw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> $ ./pg_archivecleanup -x "bz2" /tmp 000000010000000100000058
>>
>> Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional.
>> Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't think the previous patch
>> will complain about that either; or at least I don't see why the
>> behavior should be any different.
>
> Can someone enlighten me on this point?
>
mmm! you're right... it's not complaining either... i was sure it was...
and i'm not sure i want to contor things for that...
so, just forget my last mail about that... your refactor is just fine for me
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-03-28 16:19:35 | Re: max_files_per_process ignored on Windows |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-03-28 16:12:28 | max_files_per_process ignored on Windows |