Quick Links

Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows

From:	Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc:	"P(dot) Christeas" <xrg(at)linux(dot)gr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Date:	2012-10-17 17:13:47
Message-ID:	CAHyXU0y52D2b8-qANLi0woHx-7Ubxfp7gTgZ3Oxkz=USH2F2Xg@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 14:53, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Is that defined in the standard?
>
> RETURNING isn't even defined in the standard.

Right: Point being, assumptions based on implementation ordering are
generally to be avoided unless they are explicitly defined in the
standard or elsewhere.

merlin

In response to

Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows at 2012-10-17 14:29:08 from Peter Geoghegan

Responses

Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows at 2012-10-21 05:50:47 from Albert Cervera i Areny

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Greg Stark	2012-10-17 17:17:29	Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility
Previous Message	Simon Riggs	2012-10-17 17:12:47	Re: Deprecating RULES