Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hi, Dilip!
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Test3:
>>> > pgbench -i -s 100 postgres
>>> > pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres
>>> >
>>> > Client Base Pached
>>> >
>>> > 1 20555 19404
>>> > 32 375919 332670
>>> > 64 509067 440680
>>> > 128 431346 415121
>>> > 256 380926 379176
>>>
>>> It seems like you did a copy-paste of the results with s=100 and
>>> s=300. Both are showing the exact same numbers.
>>
>>
>> Oops, my mistake, re-pasting the correct results for s=100
>>
>> pgbench -i -s 100 postgres
>> pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres
>>
>> Client Base Pached
>>
>> 1 20548 20791
>> 32 372633 355356
>> 64 532052 552148
>> 128 412755 478826
>> 256 346701 372057
>
>
> Could you please re-run these tests few times?
> Just to be sure it's a reproducible regression with s=300 and not a
> statistical error.

Probably want to run for at least 5 minutes via -T 300

merlin