Re: Optimizing pglz compressor

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Optimizing pglz compressor
Date: 2013-03-06 15:36:19
Message-ID: CAHyXU0ws0escPwTHejbPrjP1RhUmRqAwOBFqQBSUZTsOJz6Nzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>> With these tweaks, I was able to make pglz-based delta encoding perform
>> roughly as well as Amit's patch.
>
> Out of curiosity, do we know how pglz compares with other algorithms, e.g. lz4 ?

This has been a subject of much recent discussion. It compares very
poorly, but installing a new compressor tends to be problematic due to
patent concerns (something which I disagree with but it's there). All
that said, Heikki's proposed changes seem to be low risk and quite
fast.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-03-06 15:55:58 Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-03-06 14:57:13 Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump