Re: the big picture for index-only scans

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Date: 2011-08-21 08:18:42
Message-ID: CAHMh4-YPYmVbysur3a9LJkG3Ld04mpPUnwP_5r7RGczK10rjnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> a) First, my understanding of checkpoint is that it flushes all the pages,
> that got changed below a particular LSN. If we are not having a LSN in the
> visibility map, how we will be sure, that a visibility map page is getting
> flushed/not?
>

Please ignore this statement. I confused between the checkpoints
implemented in Postgres and some other database.

Gokul.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-08-21 13:24:20 Re: Question: CREATE EXTENSION and create schema permission?
Previous Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2011-08-21 07:52:25 Re: the big picture for index-only scans