Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-08-27 22:48:54 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I chose \? xxx, because it is related to psql features. I wrote commands:
>>
>> \? options
>> \? variables
>>
>> comments?
>
> Generall I like it.
>
> Some stuff I changed:
> * I rephrased the sgml changes
> * s/Printing options/Display options/. Or maybe "Display influencing
> variables"? That makes it clearer why they're listed under
> --help-variables.
> * I added \? commands as an alias for a plain \?
> That way the scheme can sensibly be expanded.
> * I renamed help_variables() to be inline with the surrounding functions.
>
> Stuff I wondered about:
> * How about making it --help=variables instead of --help-variables? That
> * Do we really need the 'Report bugs to' blurb for --help-variables?
> * Since we're not exhaustive about documenting environment variales, do
> we really need to document TMPDIR and SHELL?
> * Shouldn't we document that PROMPT1 is the standard prompt, PROMPT2 is
> for already started statements, and PROMPT3 is for COPY FROM STDIN?
>
> Looks like it's commitable next round.
>
> I've attached a incremental patch.

ISTM that you failed to attach the right patch.
help-variables-10--11.diff contains only one line.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao