From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt(at)burggraben(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.4 documentation: duplicate paragraph in logical decoding example |
Date: | 2014-07-07 03:50:17 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGgyAWykd0esaurhgp_btYYVUrdkjP1ZhiHe70LxW_xpg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder
<cmt(at)burggraben(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while reading the logical decoding docs, I came across a duplicated
> paragraph in doc/src/sgml/logicaldecoding.sgml - in the current
> master branch, lines 108 to 115 are the same as lines 117 to 124.
> I've attached a patch which removes the second instance of that
> paragraph.
> In case it is intended to demonstrate that the changes in the stream
> were not consumed by pg_logical_slot_peek_changes(),
I didn't write that text, but I think that's the reason why the same
texts exist.
> reworded like "the changes have
> not been consumed by the previous command", just to avoid making
> it look like that paragraph had been duplicated by accident :)
I'm OK with this.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2014-07-07 04:11:36 | Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-07-07 03:20:58 | Re: postgresql.auto.conf and reload |