Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Date: 2014-06-05 07:09:15
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGF5m6v_83CQ8MXHGcdzXN1U0iDfkUAfq-TryOORxBsJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>>>
>>> ANALYZE hs1;
>>> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
>>> +ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch for this.
>>
>> Why did you cut off the following part? ISTM that also needs to be back-patched.
>> So we should just do "git cherry-pick 2985e16" on 9.3.
>>
>> -begin transaction isolation level serializable;
>> +begin transaction isolation level repeatable read;
>>
>
> You are right, I did not pay attention to that at all.
> Please find attached = 2985e16 ;-)

Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2014-06-05 07:56:08 Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Previous Message Amit Langote 2014-06-05 06:11:19 Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)