Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date: 2013-09-18 17:49:56
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGCSB6fOZ5oy5-nTmmZrtW5djAYW-ERJC+RDGZKDB0PjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> >You seem to have forgotten to include the pg_stat_statements--1.2.sql
>>>> >and pg_stat_statements--1.1--1.2.sql in the patch.
>>>> Sorry again. Please find updated patch attached.
>>
>> I did not add pg_stat_statements--1.2.sql. I have added that now and updated
>> the patch again.

pg_stat_statements--1.1.sql should be removed.

+ <entry><structfield>queryid</structfield></entry>
+ <entry><type>bigint</type></entry>
+ <entry></entry>
+ <entry>Unique value of each representative statement for the
current statistics session.
+ This value will change for each new statistics session.</entry>

What does "statistics session" mean?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-09-18 17:53:07 Re: record identical operator
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-09-18 17:42:02 Re: dynamic shared memory