Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-02-28 14:26:40
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFyG=d+Y+KWWGb7qso9Zbc=2LQF8m0fC_VxNPz0kbJPQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Andres, Masao, do you need an extra round or review or do you think this is
> ready to be marked as committer?
> On my side I have nothing more to add to the existing patches.

Sorry for the late reply.

I found one problem in the latest patch. I got the segmentation fault
when I executed the following SQLs.

CREATE TABLE hoge (i int);
CREATE INDEX hogeidx ON hoge(abs(i));
INSERT INTO hoge VALUES (generate_series(1,10));
REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY hoge;

The error messages are:

LOG: server process (PID 33641) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
DETAIL: Failed process was running: REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY hoge;

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-02-28 14:55:18 Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2013-02-28 12:50:05 Re: pg_basebackup caused FailedAssertion