Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries.
Date: 2014-11-12 18:01:36
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFvGYaDUJyLF_MPysO5yBTdwUC3decaXsxOS3XmWwCU4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 10/9/14 1:58 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Also I think that it's useful to allow ALTER ROLE/DATABASE SET to
>> set PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND parameters. So, what
>> about applying the attached patch? This patch allows that and
>> changes the context of session_preload_libraries to PGC_SU_BACKEND.
>
> After looking through this again, I wonder whether there is any reason
> why ignore_system_indexes cannot be plain PGC_USERSET. With this
> change, we'd allow setting it via ALTER ROLE, but the access to
> pg_db_role_setting happens before it.

Even without the patch, we can set ignore_system_indexes
at the startup of the connection because it's defined with
PGC_BACKEND context, but the access to system tables
can happen before that. Am I missing something?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-11-12 18:04:12 Re: what does this mean: "running xacts with xcnt == 0"
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-11-12 17:53:41 Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum